[Cross-posted at LeaderTalk]
This year marks the third time I’ve started an administrative job in a new district. I’m not that old, nor am I fickle, but every move has involved exactly the “right” set of circumstances at the time. As such, I’m now entering my third different administrative induction program in my new district. They’ve run the gamut, mind you, from rigorous to basic hoop-jumping, but I’m pleased that this district has taken a relatively moderate approach with all new admins meeting monthly for two hours to get us up to speed with how they do things differently here. Most of it is need-to-know, procedural stuff like how to conduct classified and licensed evaluations and how to get the appropriate signatures on purchasing requests.
We did end up in a great discussion yesterday based on the book
“Change Leadership” which is required reading for all administrators this year. From
page 5:
The realities of today’s economy demand not only a new set of skills but also that they be acquired by all students.
The skills cited by the authors are:
-
Basic Skills (Reading, Writing, Math)
-
Foundation Skills (Knowing How to Learn)
-
Communication Skills (Listening and Oral Communication)
-
Adaptability (Creative Thinking and Problem Solving)
-
Group Effectiveness (Interpersonal Skills, Negotiation, Teamwork)
-
Influence (Organization Effectiveness and Leadership)
-
Personal Management (Self-Esteen and Motivation/Goal Setting)
-
Attitude (Positive Cognitive Style)
-
Applied Skills (Occupational and Professional Competencies)
Our little group of nine – some brand, brand new administrators and some like me who are just new to the district – sat for a while after we read the list. We all agreed that in most cases we do a pretty good job of doing the first thing. Of course, that’s what’s measured on our state tests.
What was pleasantly surprising is that the conversation actually got beyond the typical, “Well, that’s because our schools still operate on a factory model that follows an agrarian calendar” stuff that we’ve all heard ad nauseum and got into discussion about what that kind of education would look like in practice. Some of that revolved around the elementary model where (if it’s done well), students are barely even aware that the math lesson has ended and now it’s time for science. Learning doesn’t happen in discrete periods between bells, but lessons are often carried thematically through a day, week, or longer.
I realize this probably isn’t a news flash for most folks. Maybe I’m behind in this. But it was nice to be around a group of folks for a few hours that were interested in “reframing the problem” instead of simply re-hashing how we got here. I wonder what high school will look like when my kids get there. I wonder if this will all be just talk. I wonder where I can start. What are the leverage points in my school where the biggest differences can be made?
Recent Comments